Climate change fueled the fury of hurricanes Helene and Milton

Two new studies link abnormally hot water in the Gulf of Mexico to the storms’ intensity

A moving gif of Hurricane Milton bearing down on the coast of Florida on October 9. The main part of the storm is a deep red with the eye of the storm clearly visible.

Hurricane Milton, shown here bearing down on Florida on October 9, was supercharged by anomalously warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico. Earlier in its development, it had “explosively” strengthened from a Category 1 to a Category 5 hurricane in less than 24 hours, though it’s expected to weaken, but only slightly, before landfall.

NOAA

Extreme Climate Update logo

Meteorologists have watched in awe as Hurricane Milton, churning over the anomalously warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico, swiftly transformed into one of the strongest Atlantic storms on record.

Over just 20 hours on October 7, Hurricane Milton explosively intensified from a Category 1 to a catastrophic Category 5 storm, with sustained winds of 290 kilometers per hour (180 miles per hour). The storm is expected to make landfall on the west coast of Florida either late on October 9 or early October 10 as a major Category 3 or 4 hurricane, bringing deadly storm surge and hurricane-force winds to coastal regions still reeling from Hurricane Helene just two weeks earlier (SN: 10/1/24).

The rapid intensifications of both storms were fueled by the Gulf’s extremely warm water. Developing tropical storms can suck up heat from warm seawater, dragging the humid air upward where it condenses, releasing that heat into the storm’s core. As the storm moves forward, it pumps more and more water and heat into the air, and the spiraling winds will move faster and faster. Milton’s particularly explosive rate of growth may also be linked to its relatively compact size, compared with Helene (SN: 9/27/24).

Two separate reports published this week find that those warm Gulf waters were made hundreds of times more likely by human-caused climate change.

An analysis by the international World Weather Attribution, or WWA, initiative, released October 9, analyzed the role of climate change in contributing to Hurricane Helene’s intensification and its torrential rainfall, including as it moved inland across the Southern Appalachian Mountains. 

Gulf of Mexico sea surface temperatures in the path of the storm were, on average, about 1.26 degrees Celsius (2.3 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than they would have been in a world without climate change, the WWA researchers found. Or, to put it another way, the anomalously high temperatures along Helene’s path from development to landfall were made 200 to 500 times more likely due to climate change.

Scientists can estimate how much more likely or severe some past natural disasters were due to human-caused climate change. Here’s how.

Helene dumped as much as 50 to 75 centimeters of rain in some parts of Appalachia (20 to 30 inches), which led to flooding and hundreds of deaths across the U.S. Southeast. That rainfall, the researchers determined, was about 10 percent heavier than it would have been without human-caused climate change.

Climate Central, based in Princeton, N.J., contributed to the WWA’s sea surface temperature analysis for Helene. And, in a separate alert released October 7, Climate Central reported that elevated sea surface temperatures in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico were also behind the “explosive” increase in intensity of Hurricane Milton. The analysis found that the sea surface temperatures in the Gulf were made 400 to 800 times more likely over the past two weeks due to human-caused climate change.

That may be an underestimate, the group notes. Normally, Climate Central uses daily sea surface temperatures collected by the U.S. National Centers for Environmental Information. However, Hurricane Helene’s impact has temporarily knocked out the NCEI data repository, based in Asheville, N.C.

So, to do the Milton analysis, Climate Central used sea surface temperature data obtained from the European Union’s Copernicus Marine Service. And those data tend to run slightly colder, on average, than the NCEI data, says Orlando, Fla.–based climate scientist Daniel Gilford, of Climate Central.

“One of the important messages [from both reports] is that climate change is here, happening, right now,” Gilford says. “It influenced both of these storms. We know it’s to blame for these events getting to the extent that they did. And that is something dramatic. We should sit up and take notice.”

Carolyn Gramling is the earth & climate writer. She has bachelor’s degrees in geology and European history and a Ph.D. in marine geochemistry from MIT and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.