Bats wearing tiny mics reveal how the fliers avoid rush hour collisions

As thousands fly from caves at dusk, the cacophony can briefly stymie echolocation

A bat flies in a cave very close to a rocky ceiling.

A greater mouse-tailed bat flying alone can easily echolocate obstacles, but scientists studied how bats navigate in the equivalent of a loud cocktail party with the echolocation pings of many airborne together.

Jens Rydell

The first bat-wearable microphone is helping biologists study the bats’ good safety record at avoiding collisions in rush hour air.

On summer evenings, in around a minute, some 2,000 greater mouse-tailed bats can crowd out of a cave opening only about three meters square in Israel’s Hula Valley, says neuroecologist Yossi Yovel of Tel Aviv University. From a distance, their emergence looks like “a plume of smoke,” he says.

He and colleagues have now studied the echolocation chirps that let Rhinopoma microphyllum bats detect obstacles, including each other. In the crowded flight, signals from one bat often partially mask a neighbor’s, the researchers report in in the April 8 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It’s a flying mammal version of the communications perplexities of cocktail party mammals. Yet, the team found that these bats have surprisingly few collisions.

Studying bats by the thousands isn’t easy. At first, “we could only record the bat from the ground,” Yovel says. That limited the information so much that he and colleagues designed microphones small enough to fasten (temporarily) to bats that weigh around 40 grams, lighter than a newborn kitten. The goal was crafting a device adding only four grams to the flying animal’s weight, a little less than a nickel.

In this closeup of a bat being gently held in a yellow cloth, you can see a little silver cylinder attached to two wires on its head.
A tiny silver microphone lets greater mouse-tailed bats make the first in-air recordings of bat echolocation pinging that reduces in-air collisions when thousands fly together.Noam Cvikel

Researchers used in-air recordings from four little microphones plus flight paths from 96 tracked bats to create computer models of bat exodus and echolocation. This bat version of sonar, chirping and then listening for echoes, can locate obstacles, prey and each other.

At the cave’s tight exit hole, as much as 90 percent of the echolocation chirping can be masked. But pings from the important, closet neighbors in the congestion tend to be less so, especially ones from a bat directly in front because it’s projecting echolocation calls forward. Plus, the chirping “has a lot of redundancy,” Yovel says. Eventually enough pieces of a message get through.

The evening rush hour commute for greater mouse-tailed bats has surprisingly few midair collisions (marked in video). Starting from inside a cave where thousands of Rhinopoma microphyllum bats huddle during the day, the colony streams out a narrow exit to hunt in Israel’s Hula Valley.

Also, he adds, “the moment they emerge through the hole, they start moving to the side,” lessening collision risk. As they fly more than a kilometer in their smoke-plume formation, bat-to-bat distance leaves room to hear themselves echolocate.

The paper itself could be an echo (with a twist) on a cocktail party challenge for fringe-lipped bats hunting túngara frogs in Central and South America. Targeting by sound alone would be a challenge in frog-pool cacophony. A bat’s echolocation, however, can ping one calling frog’s ballooning throat pouch.

Susan Milius is the life sciences writer, covering organismal biology and evolution, and has a special passion for plants, fungi and invertebrates. She studied biology and English literature.