- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
PHILADELPHIA - For the folks who promote vaccination, these are trying times. Recently, CNN hosted a segment titled: “Virus or Vaccine: Which is Worse?”
It’s enough to set Paul Offit to ranting, which he did this week at a meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Offit, a physician who heads the infectious disease division at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, has devoted a career to fighting illness. In his job, vaccines are often the most reliable weapon available, and cost-effective to boot. And although it’s astonishingly more dangerous to contract a disease than it is to get vaccinated for it, that message seems to have gotten lost somewhere along the way.
Offit traces this detour back to 1982, when DPT — the shot that prevents diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis – was (wrongly) linked to brain damage. “Three people believed their kids were harmed by the vaccine,” he says.
Offit has compassion for families who have a child who has suffered, whatever the cause may be, known or unknown. But since 1982, it’s been one accusation after another against vaccines. People tried to link the HIB vaccine to diabetes (no evidence), the hepatitis B vaccine to multiple sclerosis (all but one study found no link), and other vaccines to SIDS or autism. Recently, the HPV vaccine — which prevents cervical cancer – got linked to heart attacks and strokes (no proof).
And now the seasonal flu vaccine and H1N1 flu vaccine are being skipped by millions of people who somehow distrust the science that went into making them, even though the illnesses they cause can be fatal.
But hey, it’s a free country. Paul Offit just throws up his hands: “Is it your right to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection? The answer is ‘yes,’” he says.
Mary Ann Jackson, a physician who heads the infectious disease section at Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics in Kansas City, Mo., investigates vaccination rates among specific groups. She says that the new generation of people dodging vaccines includes many white, college-educated women, often young mothers who get their information from the Internet. The odd part, Jackson says, is that these same women are also health-conscious, seat-belt-buckling folks. “They are trying to choose what’s best for their children. They want it to be their own decision,” she says.
Unfortunately, avoiding vaccination has consequences beyond one household. It turns people into pathogen carriers and provides viruses with convenient hiding places. “Herd immunity is eroding to the point that we’re now seeing outbreaks of preventable diseases,” says Offit. In 2004, for example, the United States experienced its worst outbreak of whooping cough (pertussis) in years. Mumps has also cropped up. Daycares have become high-risk areas because they’ve got a population of children who are relatively under-vaccinated, he says. “Doctors are worried about their waiting rooms being dangerous places.”
William Schaffner, a physician who chairs the Department of Preventive Medicine at Vanderbilt University, cited a recent round of focus groups held to discuss vaccines. Some people voiced doubts about vaccine safety. But Schaffner was impressed by one group of participants who were adamantly in favor of vaccination: immigrants from developing countries. “They knew about these diseases,” he says.
Meanwhile, infectious disease experts have little use for “natural exposure” adherents, which include parents who have been known to host chickenpox parties or who otherwise intentionally expose their children to a disease rather than get the kids vaccinated. Chickenpox is far from harmless. While most cases in young children are indeed benign, older children and adults can get terrible illnesses. And getting chickenpox as a child puts a person at risk of getting shingles when older, whereas there is no evidence that a chickenpox vaccination does.
It’s easy to see why these scientists get frustrated. But sometimes not even a barrage of facts helps their cause. Ronald Reagan famously said, “Facts are stupid things.” Maybe so, maybe no.
For example, the vaccine for H1N1 flu is now being distributed nationwide. But among pregnant women, who can go to the front of that line, three-fourths aren’t getting vaccinated, even though H1N1 is particularly lethal for them and — as if that weren’t enough — it poses risks to theirs fetuses. Facts are scary things.
Health-care workers, another bunch who should know better, also don’t necessarily get vaccinated. Jackson was shocked to find flu vaccination rates of only 50 percent among hospital workers she studied.
So despite vaccines’ overwhelming safety profile when compared to the risks run by exposure to the diseases they prevent, and despite the exhortations of the CDC and World Health Organization, some people just gravitate toward other sources of information they deem more reliable.
"There’s a post-modernist notion that all levels of belief are acceptable,” Offit says.
The vaccine disconnect brings to mind a bumper sticker seen a few years ago, when some school boards and even the state of Kansas were openly advocating the teaching of an alternative explanation to counter Darwin’s theory of evolution.
The bumper sticker read: “What’s next — gravity?”
Found in: Biology

- Science & the Public : H1N1 vaccine: Counting side effects
- Getting to the core of H1N1 flu deaths
- H1N1 flu is back and found in 37 states, CDC reports
- H1N1 racks up frequent flier miles
- Science & the Public : Flu: Grim stats
- Science & the Public : Cats attracted to ADHD drug, a feline poison
- Deleted Scenes : Spirit: 'The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated'
- Science & the Public : Scientists offer compelling images of Gulf War illness
- Science & the Public : For a lucky few, ‘dioxins’ might be heart healthy
- Science & the Public : Green-ish pesticides bee-devil honey makers


Actually, here are just a few peer-reviewed studies documenting cases of shingles following varicella vaccination.
Matsubara K, Nigami H, Harigaya H, Baba K. Herpes zoster in a normal child after varicella vaccination. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1995 Oct; 37(5):648–50.
Hammerschlag MR, Gershon AA, Steinberg SP, Clarke L, Gelb LD. Herpes zoster in an adult recipient of live attenuated varicella vaccine. J Infect Dis, 1989 Sept; 160(3):535–7.
Uebe B, Sauerbrei A, Burdach S, Horneff G. Herpes zoster by reactivated vaccine varicella zoster virus in a healthy child. Eur J Pediatr, 2002 Aug; 161(8):442–4.
A 27-month-old girl developed an impressive herpes zoster infection 16 months after varicella vaccination that was localized in three adjacent cervical dermatomes. VZV vaccine stain was identified by polymerase chain reaction.
Naseri A, Good WV, Cunningham ET Jr. Herpes zoster virus sclerokeratitis and anterior uveitis in a child following varicella vaccination. Am J Ophthalmol, 2003 Mar; 135(3):415–7.
Binder NR, Holland GN, Hosea S, Silverberg ML. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus in an otherwise-healthy child. J AAPOS, 2005 Dec; 9(6):597–8.
A case of pediatric herpes zoster ophthalmicus in a child that had been vaccinated against varicella and otherwise had no known exposure to varicella-zoster virus and the initial presentation of HZO was a painful and diffuse subconjunctival hemorrhage that appeared before any of its classic signs were observed.
Kohl S. Rapp J, La Russa P, Gershon AA, Steinberg SP. Natural varicella-zoster virus reactivation shortly after varicella immunization in a child. Pediatr. Infect. Dis J. 1999 Dec;18(12):1112–3.
Twelve days following varicella vaccination in his right arm, a 6-year-old male developed wild-type herpes zoster rash on his back and left arm.
Levin MJ, Dahl KM, Weinberg A, Giller R, Patel A, Krause PR. Development of resistance to acyclovir during chronic infection with the Oka vaccine strain of varicella-zoster virus, in an immunosuppressed child. J Infect Dis. 2003 Oct 1;188(7):954–9.
A 1-year-old boy was vaccinated with the Oka strain of varicella just prior to the discovery of a tumor that required intensive antitumor therapy. Three months later he developed herpes zoster, which developed into chronic verrucous lesions that were refractory to treatment with acyclovir and which subsequently disseminated. DNA from a biopsy specimen of a chronic herpes-zoster lesion indicated that the Oka vaccine strain of the virus caused this severe complication. Analysis of this viral DNA demonstrated a mutation in the viral thymidine kinase gene. Plasmids containing this altered gene were unable to produce functional thymidine kinase in an in vitro translation system. The presence of this mutation would explain the clinical resistance to acyclovir. This is the first report of Oka-strain varicella virus causing severe disease after reactivation and of resistance to acyclovir during an infection caused by this virus.
Ota K, Kim V, Lavi S, Ford-Jones EL, Tipples G, Scolnik D, Tellier R. Vaccine-strain varicella zoster virus causing recurrent herpes zoster in an immunocompetent 2-year-old. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Sep;27(9):847–8.
Varivax III is a live attenuated vaccine against varicella zoster virus (VZV). The authors report “a case of recurrent vaccine-strain herpes zoster in an immunocompetent 2-year-old child.” This report aims to alert physicians that recurrent vaccine-strain herpes zoster can be a rare complication of VZV vaccination in apparently immunocompetent hosts.
Iyer S, Mittal MK, Hodinka RL.Herpes Zoster and Meningitis Resulting From Reactivation of Varicella Vaccine Virus in an Immunocompetent Child. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov 22.
Herpes zoster complicated by meningitis has been mainly reported in immunocompromised patients after reactivation of wild-type varicella-zoster virus. We present one of the first cases of aseptic meningitis after herpes zoster caused by reactivation of vaccine-type varicella-zoster virus in an immunocompetent child. We also highlight the increasing role of both wild-type and vaccine strains of varicella-zoster virus as a cause of viral meningoencephalitis and the use of appropriate laboratory tools to rapidly and accurately identify the virus in order to provide prompt patient care and management.
Here are some first-hand experiences sent referred to me directly:
On November 5, 2007, parents of a daughter with shingles wrote Dr. Goldman:
“A friend of mine e-mailed me a link to an article you had written regarding the chickenpox vaccine. Our oldest daughter who is only 16 recently suffered from her second bout with shingles. She first had an episode of shingles at the age of 13. Our daughter NEVER had chickenpox, but was given the varicella vaccine in 1995. We were never told or even warned that it could cause shingles. We find it unbelievable that the ‘solution’ we are being provided is to go to the Infectious Disease Department at a local University Hospital in order to have them ‘help us manage’ this for the rest of our daughter’s life. Now we have to remedy the shingles and we are altogether convinced that there will be many, many other young people adversely affected by what is a dangerous vaccine with awful side affects that stay with you for a lifetime...far worse than chickenpox in one’s youth. Our daughter missed a week of school each time and suffered incredibly....”
On September 22, 2008, a nurse telephoned Dr. Goldman to report the following:
“My son, who had natural chickenpox at 3 years of age, and who is now 16 years old, has been recovering for the past 6½ months from herpes zoster (with a rash in the T1 dermatome). He experienced vomiting and severe headaches that lead to a diagnosis of viral meningitis from central nervous system (CNS) complications of herpes zoster.”
Interestingly, the nurse indicated that the physician treating her son had encountered another teen with the same diagnosis a week prior to her son’s case.
Sincerely,
Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D.
Summary statement regarding the Universal Varicella Vaccination Program
Prior to the universal varicella vaccination program, 95% of adults experienced natural chickenpox (usually as school age children)—these cases were usually benign and resulted in long term immunity. This high percentage of individuals having long term immunity has been compromised by mass vaccination of children which provides at best 70 to 90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown duration—shifting chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where chickenpox carries 20 times more risk of death and 15 times more risk of hospitalization compared to children. Add to this the adverse effects of both the chickenpox and shingles vaccines as well as the potential for increased risk of shingles for an estimated 30 to 50 years among adults. The Universal Varicella (Chickenpox) Vaccination Program now requires booster vaccines; however, these are less effective than the natural immunity that existed in communities prior to licensure of the varicella vaccine. Routine vaccination against chickenpox has produced continual cycles of treatment and disease.
Vaccines are by far more dangerous than any virus and they are only administered because its easy and very big money for Big pharma. MOreover, vaccines dont work and irronically you dont have to prove it.
If swine flu vaccine is so safe, why drug companies were give protection so that nonone could sue the for swine flu vaccine caused damage.
It is people like Offit who are destroying science and too many parents painfully, had to learn that lesson the hard way. The medical community broke the trust.
On the issue of vaccinations, the medical community is morally bankrupt and Offit is taking what little integrity you have left into the toilet.
Offit says kids can get 100,000 vaccinations.....on what planet? I respect good credible science and Offit is no scientist.
Dear 'ahscience-teacher' (and any other vaccine-pushers),
Is it impossible for you to see that perhaps we should go back to a vaccine schedule more similar to the early 1980's? We had far fewer vaccines back then and of course (not surprisingly) far less autism, type 1 diabetes, food allergies, etc. etc... It doesn't take a genius to realize that vaccines are injuring our kids in record numbers today.
What peer-reviewed studies support your following statements?
1) that there was less autism, type 1 diabetes, etc. back then than now
2) that vaccines are related to the asserted rises in these illnesses
I really wonder if there is data to support what you are alleging. Scientifically, it may be hard to say if the incidents of these diseases are going up or down. But, maybe someone has done the studies and the studies have passed peer-review. And, of course, the studies have been replicated. So, if you know of that literature, would you please post references? Thanks.
Actually, no I won't ahscience-teacher. Do your own research. Go to any school in the US and ask them about their rates of autism and/or type 1 diabetes and/or food allergies? Then, do your homework as to the neurotoxic affects of the ingredients in vaccinations. Then, feel free to read some of the package inserts that come with the vaccinations. Go ahead, do it. Don't ask me to do your work for you...
1. We have more autism now, so it must be due to vaccines. Much of the increase in "autism" is due to changes in diagnostic criteria. The rest is linked to two factors:
A. TV watching by very small children causes them to move higher on the autism scale. (Asperger's scale.) That "Baby Einstein" video may be quite bad if your kid is susceptible. In previous times American kids had much less opportunity to not interact socially when infants or toddlers than today. Now, they do. Adults can move as much as 10 points up on the Asperger's scale from the beginning to the end of graduate school in sciences. Environment can have an effect.
B. Genetic concentration of autism traits. This explanation is very simple. In the modern world, autistic type traits of concentration are valuable. (i.e. engineering skills, programming). Those people concentrate in population centers where they meet each other and interbreed. They concentrate those characteristics, and there you are.
2. Diabetes has increased since the 80's therefore it must be the increase in vaccines. Diabetes has been linked to three other factors, but not vaccines.
A. BPA in plastics and the mass consumption of drinks, from water to soft drinks in plastic bottles. BPA acts in the insulin system. Charting the market share of bottled water in plastic bottles matches the rise in diabetes.
B. Use of sunblock and less outdoor exercise resulting in radically lowered levels of Vitamin D in adults and children. The curve for use of sunblock also matches the rise in diabetes, and is inverse to the lowering of skin cancer. We know that vitamin D is necessary for proper insulin function. Vitamin D is probably also a culprit (its lack) in our national depression epidemic.
C. Children getting very little exercise.
Regarding the first set of papers cited on side effects, yes, those things can happen. They are very rare, 1 in a million occurrences. But death from chickenpox is not a 1 in a million occurrence, it's a 3 in 10,000 occurrence for adults. It's that simple.
The cited papers are also part of the store of data that has been used to guide the chickenpox vaccination program. The result of that is changes in recommendations to use more than one vaccination. The live vaccine is not usually part of those today, instead antigen vaccine is used. (Which I disagree with.) Antigen vaccines are notorious for conferring lower levels of immunity than desired. See: [Link was removed]
Relative to risks in general, most people have no idea that in the USA, for instance, 15,000 or more people die of aspirin poisoning each year. 36,000 people die of influenza. The controversy over vaccinations is like plane crashes. We hear about plane crashes because they are so rare. This can make a person think that air travel isn't safe, when actually it is safer than walking across the street. Vaccination is like that. Very rarely, someone will have a negative effect, but immunologically, it is unlikely that this person with a rare problem would not have had a worse problem with the disease.
I hope this helps some people understand better.
So - by the time I could get the vaccine, I will likely have been exposed, or even caught H1N1. And my reading of the literature tells me that if I get the shot - it will actually increase my chances of catching the normal flus. And that the regular flu vaccine increases chances of H1H1. So - as soon as I've had H1N1 I'll get the regular shot. Hopefully I'll get neither.
The arrogance of the medical establishment is nothing new. I don't need people telling me I'm a fool if I don't take their advice unquestioned. I need them to realistically tell me what the risks are.
Let's also keep in mind how incredibly stupid it is to inject yourself with a known neurotoxin (mercury) on the off chance that it may (but very unlikely) prevent you from getting the flu. The flu, which in extremely rare circumstances may cause you a problem.... You have a 99.9% chance of recovering just fine from the flu. Don't fall for the fear mongering about the H1N1 virus.
Now, that's about usual, a little low, but the difference with H1N1 is that mortality is highest for children and young adults. Usually it is the other way around.
You get more mercury in a single tuna fish sandwich than in a vaccine shot Susie-Q. But, CDC has single dose H1N1 shots without the preservative if you want them.
[Link was removed]
"ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
(p. 3).
John,
If you are interested in injecting a known neurotoxin into your body, that's your choice. Personally, I think that's foolish but whatever ... each to their own. I worry about all those pregnant moms who are getting the flu shots though... no doubt their babies will be at higher risk for immune system/neurological problems. Sad. As for your link... completely irrelevant and moronic.
Also involving study scientists, CDC, and WHO.
See:
youtube Gary Null at NYS hearing on vaccinations
and
Alexander Sanger's blog
The No-Brainer Syndrome : the HPV Vaccine and Male Circumcision Recommendations as the Latest Weapons in the Fight Against HPV, HIV and AIDS
As the article says, it's interesting that people are pro-vaccination when they have any experience of serious infectious diseases. Really, folks: this is a case for turning on your risk assessment abilities. Nothing is ever totally safe. Vaccines are thousands, often millions of times safer than the diseases they prevent.
I come at this from both sides. I have a degree as doctor of naturopathy and am very sympathetic to people looking for natural, chemical-free solutions. I also have a Ph.D. in biology and some experience evaluating scientific evidence. I'm sorry to say this to the anti-vaccine people, but not only are you just plain wrong but you're also endangering everyone around you.
I also have to say that I know it's not really your fault. News organizations have been milking anti-vaccine hysteria for every eyeball it can give them, which leaves many people with the false impression that there's something to the sensationalist nonsense.
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
Please login or register to participate.