Solar system's future could be bumpy
Study calculates the odds that two planets collide or one crashes into sun in the next 5 billion years
font_down font_up Text Size
access
PLANETARY BUMPER CARS. Chaotic perturbations of orbits, largely due to the gravitational effects of Jupiter, could send planets in the inner solar system crashing into one another (such as Mars and Earth, illustrated here) sometime in the next 5 billion years, a new study suggests.ILLUSTRATION: J. Vidal-Madjar, IMCEE-CNRS

It’s happened before, and it could happen again: Planets in the inner solar system may collide if gravitational interactions substantially disturb now-stable orbits, a new study suggests.

Scientists and mathematicians have long known that the equations describing the orbital motions of any group of three or more objects can’t be solved exactly. Even with the most powerful computers, it is hopeless to try to determine precisely what planetary orbits will look like more than a few million years in the future, says Jacques Laskar of the Paris Observatory. The results of any single simulation offer nothing more than one possible outcome, but running a large number of simulations can provide insights into overall probabilities, he notes.  

Now, a large-scale study by Laskar and observatory colleague Mickael Gastineau, which appears in the June 11 Nature, provides a possibly frightening glimpse into the solar system’s future. It’s a future in which, literally, worlds collide.

The computer model used by Laskar and Gastineau accounts for the gravitational interactions among the moon, the eight major planets and Pluto, as well as any effects of general relativity. For the new study, the researchers started with the best known information about the position and orbital velocity of each of the 10 bodies, and marched simulations forward in nine-day steps for the next 5 billion years, the projected life of the sun. To obtain a large sample of possible futures, Laskar and Gastineau ran 2,501 scenarios. The only difference between runs was the size of Mercury’s orbit. In the second and each subsequent simulation, the size differed by only .38 millimeters.  

For the first few million years, planetary orbits hardly differed from one run to the next. Eventually, though, variations began to accumulate. Most of the detrimental changes resulted from Jupiter’s gravitational tug on Mercury, the inner planet with the most lopsided orbit, Laskar says. In one simulation, Mercury collides with Venus about 1.76 billion years from now. In another, those planets come within 6,500 kilometers of a collision about 4.9 billion years in the future. In three other simulations, Mercury’s orbit becomes so lopsided that it falls into the sun.

In yet another scenario, Mars swings within 800 kilometers of Earth about 3.34 billion years from now. During such a close approach, tidal flexing within Mars’ crust could break that planet apart and fragments could strike Earth — a generally disastrous result, Laskar notes.

Using the Earth-Mars close encounter as a starting point, Laskar and Gastineau then ran another 201 simulations to assess the possibility that the near miss could lead to a direct collision. In 196 of those computer runs, one planet in the inner solar system either slammed into another or fell into the sun. Of those scenarios, Earth was struck 48 times: once by Mercury, 18 times by Venus and 29 times by Mars.

Despite the dire outcomes of a few of these scenarios, the team’s findings hint that the odds are overwhelmingly in Earth’s favor. “I prefer to see the glass as 99 percent full and only 1 percent empty,” says Gregory Laughlin, an astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz. “It’s encouraging to think that the solar system is here for the duration,” he notes.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos, Earth and Planetary Science
Comments 4
  • Jacques Laskar doesn't know anything about gravitation and cause of planetary orbits stability.
    His computer fantasy has no any generality with physics of gravity.
    All planetary orbits are stable in principal. They are formed during trillions years.
    See http://bourabai.kz/watchmaker-e.htm
    http://bourabai.kz/mechanics-e.htm
    http://bourabai.kz/wind-e.htm
    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Jun. 11, 2009 at 1:53am
  • Were the outer solar system bodies included in the calculation?

    Were any hypothetical bodies added to represent wandering masses from outside the solar system?
    Pat Moore Pat Moore
    Jun. 13, 2009 at 5:15am
  • Jaques Laskar must have a pretty big computer to do Monte Carlo style studies of the Solar system. I'm jealous. His nine-day timestep seems a little long for modeling the inner solar system but would take my little VA Disability computer/toy literally years to produce just one simulation over five billion years.

    I would call the study valid, though, if it is thought of as representative samples of what might happen, rather than saying that his scenarios WILL happen. My studies indicate that most solar systems, with more mass than ours as seen by exoplanet surveys, are not stable at all. This might be the explanation for the "Fermi Paradox" ("If there are aliens, where are they?)

    Michael C. Emmert
    Michael Emmert Michael Emmert
    Jun. 14, 2009 at 6:17pm
  • No need to wait billions of years. No collision required. All it would take to catastrophically disturb Earth's orbit is a close pass by a moon-size body from outside the solar system. Even a small increase in earth's orbital eccentricity could cause huge climate changes. We already know there are "rogue" stars... why not planet size objects or smaller.

    Fred Coppin Fred Coppin
    Jun. 15, 2009 at 10:26pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Cowen, R. 2009. The Solar System's Big Bang. Science News 175 (Feb 14):26. [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Laskar, J., and M. Gastineau. 2009. Existence of collisional trajectories of Mercury, Mars and Venus with the Earth. Nature 459(June 11):817.
  • Laughlin, G. 2009. The Solar System's extended shelf life. Nature 459(June 11):781.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator