Smallest exoplanet yet is found
Planet is just under twice Earth's size
font_down font_up Text Size
access
GREAT NEIGHBORSThis diagram shows the position of the four planets in the Gliese 581 system. The newly found, innermost body is Gliese 581 e, the smallest exoplanet yet discovered. The habitable zone (blue region), where water could exist as a liquid, clearly includes the outermost planet, Gliese 581 d.IMAGE: ESO, based on a diagram by F. Selsis/Univ. of Bordeaux

Inching ever closer to the goal of discovering a planet just like home, Swiss astronomers have announced finding the smallest extrasolar planet ever detected. The object, a mere 20.5 light-years away, could be as tiny as 1.9 Earths and isn’t likely to exceed twice that amount.

The feat of detecting a planet not much heavier than Earth, says Stephane Udry of the University of Geneva’s observatory in Sauverny, Switzerland, shows that astronomers “are on the right track” for the ultimate discovery: finding an Earthlike planet that orbits another star in the habitable zone, the region around a star in which water could exist as a liquid.

Veteran planet hunter Michel Mayor, also of the Geneva Observatory, described his team’s findings on April 21 at the European Joint National Astronomy Meeting at the University of Hertfordshire in Hatfield, England. Researchers have now found more than 340 extrasolar planets.

Another planet in the same system, although not as close in size to Earth, is now the only known low-mass planet that does in fact orbit in the habitable zone, the team also announced at the meeting. “Gliese 581 is a truly fascinating exoplanet system,” comments theorist Sara Seager of MIT. “It is like a gift that keeps on giving.”

access
VIEW FROM GLIESE EAn artist's rendering of one of the planets orbiting the nearby star Gliese 581, now known to host the smallest known exoplanet (illustrated in foreground) and also a relatively small planet that orbits at just the right distance from the star to have liquid water (illustrated as the blue planet).IMAGE: European Southern Observatory

According to the leading model of planet formation, an orb as small as the newly found planet, 581 e, would almost certainly be rocky like Earth, rather than icy or gaseous. But because the planet lies so close to its parent star, a red dwarf called Gliese 581, it’s hot enough to boil away any surface water and could not support life similar to that on Earth.

Mayor and his colleagues, including Udry, detected the tiny planet indirectly by the gentle pull the planet exerts on its parent star — not much different than the minuscule tug a mouse might exert on an elephant. Just barely detectable by a sensitive spectrograph on the European Southern Observatory’s 3.6-meter telescope at La Silla in Chile, that wobble reveals that the close-in planet takes just 3.15 days to whip around Gliese 581 in a circular orbit.

Previous observations with the same spectrograph had already shown that Gliese 581 harbors three other relatively small planets: a Neptune-sized planet and two others dubbed superEarths, each with a minimum mass several times that of Earth’s (SN: 4/28/07, p. 259).

The newly discovered Gliese 581 e lies closest to the star. Next in line is Gliese 581 b, with a minimum mass of 16 Earths (similar to Neptune), Gliese 581 c, with a minimum mass of five Earths, and Gliese 581 d, which orbits in the habitable zone and has a minimum mass of seven Earths.

Earlier observations had indicated that Gliese 581 d orbited its parent star in about 80 days and resided right at the outer edge of the habitable zone. New measurements by Mayor's team place Gliese 581 d closer to the star, with a 68.6-day orbit, and unequivocally in the habitable zone, Udry says. It's even possible, he says, that Gliese 581 d could have a deep ocean.

Although the wobble method reveals only the minimum mass of Gliese 581 e, it’s highly unlikely that the planet could be more than four Earth masses, notes Udry. That’s because the four planets are “packed so tightly,” says Seager, that were Gliese 581 e much heavier, gravitational interactions between it and the other planets would force the body into a more elongated orbit.

The Swiss team is now trying to determine whether the new-found planet transits, or periodically passes in front of its star as seen from Earth. If it does, the amount of starlight the planet blots out would reveal its radius and precise mass. That in turn would indicate whether the planet is truly rocky or its density is too low for rockiness. In addition, starlight filtering through the planet’s atmosphere during transits would reveal the composition of the atmosphere. The team will start looking for transits using ground-based telescopes about a week from the announcement, followed up by observations with NASA’s orbiting Spitzer Space Telescope.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 5
  • Intriguing!

    Are red dwarfs as stable in their life cycles as our sun? (Referring to heat, light, energy, solar wind, etc.)

    Would a planet with mass of seven Earths be expected to capture a more dense atmosphere than Earth has? Would that make it more prone to a strong greenhouse effect? If so, that would seem to lengthen the habitable zone for planets that massive. Has that already been taken into account in the diagram?
    S Gruhn S Gruhn
    Apr. 21, 2009 at 7:10pm
  • As a microbiologist, I have often thought that a planet with super-earth gravity and a combination of atmosphere and distance that makes it's temperature habitable would be an excellent place for life, better than our planet. This is just my opinion, but I tend to think that our earth is a relatively rare anomaly for planets supporting life. We are so close to the edge of being able to keep an atmosphere.

    As Gruhn mentions below, this makes our planet one that can be closer to the sun than larger planets with deeper atmosphere.
    John Toradze John Toradze
    Apr. 22, 2009 at 8:55pm
  • Red dwarfs are more stable in their life cycles than our sun. See: http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/teachers/lessons/xray_spectra/background-lifecycles.html

    So life would have more time to develop while orbiting a red dwarf. The star would burn more slowly, and its solar wind would not be as strong. That would, in turn, mean that the atmosphere would not be removed by the solar wind as quickly as our sun removes our atmosphere.
    John Toradze John Toradze
    Apr. 22, 2009 at 8:58pm
  • Wow . Fascinating. I believe there is life on an other planet in universe
    MESUT KOROGLU MESUT KOROGLU
    Apr. 28, 2009 at 5:06pm
  • What Makes A Planet An Earth Counterpart


    A. "Smallest exoplanet yet is found"
    http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/43038/title/Smallest_exoplanet_yet_is_found
    Finding a planet just under twice Earth's size puts astronomers closer to discovering an Earth counterpart.


    B. What is "an Earth counterpart"?

    An "Earth counterpart" may be either a still "pre-lifed" or an already "bio-sphered" planet.

    The features that would render a pre-lifed planet a pre-lifed Earth counterpart would include the environmental and compositional parameters of the 4.6 BYA Earth.

    The features that would render a bio-sphered planet a bio-sphered Earth counterpart would include a bio-sphere comprising the Planet's primal organisms, its genes, and the chemical constituents of their evolved organisms, where:

    Organism = a self-replicable temporary constrained-energy genetic system that supports and maintains a planet's biosphere by maintenance of its genes.


    Dov Henis
    (comments from the 22nd century)
    "Life's Manifest"
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page#578
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    May. 1, 2009 at 5:43am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Cowen, R. 2007. In the Zone: Extrasolar planet with the potential for life. Science News 171(April 28):259. [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator