- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
The wild spins of electrons in a semiconductor can be tamed by guiding their collective motions into a synchronized helix, new research shows. The study, published April 2 in Nature, uncovers new principles of physics and holds promise for the development of new information-carrying gadgets.
“The experiment is a fundamental discovery — a discovery with a device potential,” comments Jaroslav Fabian, of the University of Regensburg in Germany.
Electrons behave like spinning tops, complete with angular momentum. Because of this property, an electron winds up with a small magnetic field, as if the electron has a little bar magnet inside, says study coauthor Jake Koralek of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Calif. While the charge of the electron is always negative, the electron spin can be either up or down, depending on the orientation of the spin axis. “This [spin] is an untapped property of the electron,” Koralek says. Understanding and manipulating electron spins is the goal of a new research area dubbed spintronics.
The major challenge of making spins serve as useful data carriers is reliability. As electrons whiz through matter, the spins occasionally flip. A group of electrons with spins all up may quickly decay to have spins that are equally up and down — meaning they’d drop any information they were carrying.
“The environment is typically destructive for the spins,” says Fabian, who authored an accompanying commentary in the same issue of Nature. “Can the spins shield themselves against it? That is what the paper is about.”
To keep spins stable, Koralek and his team created a special semiconducting material that coaxed the individual spins in such a way that their orientations create a coordinated helix, which has never been observed before. The researchers set the wavelength of the helix by using two lasers to set alternating spin states — some up, some down — in a process called spin-grating.
The researchers found that incorporating two fine-tuned factors into their calculations led to stability and increased the life span of the helical spins 100-fold. These two factors — called the Rashba and the Dresselhaus — lead to “a new type of spin conservation,” says Koralek. “We can move spins around quickly, and still know exactly what each spin is.”
The researchers found that electrons in the new system had stable spins for up to a nanosecond or so, meaning the forces that make spins flip have “been made irrelevant,” for a relatively long period of time, says Koralek.
This new type of stability is relatively safe from temperature effects, Koralek says. Although stronger at very cold temperatures, the stable helix persists at room temperature. This may make the technology feasible for use in everyday devices in the future.
“It’s exciting because of this very unusual fundamental system,” says Koralek. “This opens up doors for a lot of new physics.”
Found in: Physics and Technology
- Koralek, J.D., et al. 2009. Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells. Nature 458(April 2):610-613. doi:10.1038/nature07871


But, why are real world processes truly random? One day I was thinking of quantum entaglement. Suppose that during the big bang all quantum phenomena were entangled. Not just the ones we currently understand like the spin of paired positrons. What if momentum of quantum particles were entangled in the big bang? Then, the objects e experience in every day life might well be entangled with particles in the hearts of stars on the other side of the universe.
Wouldn't this explain many of the unusual properties of quantum electro-dynamics and also of the more general case of "random" behavior of sub-atomic processes?
Good luck on your Nobel prize if the idea is in any way helpful...
In his Miracle 1905 Einstein wrote the Fourth paper:
“ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.” ( SRT).
And as a postscript to his forth, the Fifth paper:
“ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”
As he realized the answer was:
“ Yes, it depends on its energy E= Mc^2.”
It means what SRT must be connected with E= Mc^2 .
It means what must be connection between Lorentz’s
transformation and E= Mc^2.
April 2009.
The same Einstein’s question in a little detail interpretation:
“Does the inertia of a body ( for example: of a light quanta
or of an electron) depend upon its energy content E=Mc^2 ?”
Thinking logically, the answer must be : Yes, it depends.”
When new question arise: ” How is possible to understand the
connection between E=Mc^2 and E=ht or E= kb or E= hf. ?”
On my opinion " The Law of Conservation and Transformation
of Energy/ Mass" (according to one single light quanta /electron )
gives answer to this question..
The problem is that now nobody wants to ask yourself that
„The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass"
means according to one single light quanta / photon /electron.
============== . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
http://www.socratus.com
http://www.wbabin.net
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2548
================
=================
Robert Milliken, who measured a charge of electron, in his
Nobel speech ( 1923) told, that he knew nothing about the
“last essence of electron”.
In that case there is one old joke.
One professor asked a student:
“ What is an electron?”
“ Ah, God damn it! I have forgotten. And in fact even in the
morning I knew it. ”- the student answered.
“ You should recollect it without fail, - professor said -
because you were the unique person who knew, what electron
was, and you had suddenly forgotten!”
This old joke does not grow old.
And today the question: “What is the electron?” remains without answer.
How the electron looks nobody knows.
What is the specific formula of the electron ?
=======
1.
Physical parameters of an electron (mass, charge)
were discovered as a result of experiments.
2.
Einstein, Bohr wrote down energy of an electron
(in interaction with atom) by the formula:
E=hf.
3.
In 1928 Dirack formulated the equation of an electron,
(relativistic equation of the electron) in such way:
E = (+ / -) mc^2
4.
Why does nobody analyze interrelation between
energy of Einstein/ Bohr’s electron ( E=hf ) and
energy of Dirack,s electron ( E = (+/-) mc^2)
It means, that one electron has three (3) formulas
of energy.
It means that an electron is really a very complex
particle and according to Hertz it is possible to say,
that the formulas of an electron are cleverer than the man.
If somebody will try to explain why electron has three (3)
formulas, please, recollect that an electron is not a firm figure.
Electron can change its own form depending on its speed.
It means, that energy, mass and form (together) of an electron
depend from some kind of movement. And it is impossible
that electron can change its form, its energy but its charge
will remain constant.
Electron can change its charge too.
These changes of an electron depend on its own impulse.
===========
5.
In 1916 Sommerfeld discovered the formula of an electron.
The formula of electron is:
(e^2= hca).
But nowhere, in no textbook
the formula of electron is not written down in this way.
Why?
Nobody can understand what sense of constants
in the Sommerfeld.s formula of electron is.
==================
The formula of Sommerfeld,s electron consists
from three constants:
1.
h=h/2pi (impulse of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck)
2.
c (speed of quantum of light)
3.
a ( ‘ fine structure constant ‘ )
The existence of this extremely important fundamental dimensionless
constant remained unexplained till now.
And this quantity determines a condition of an electron
It means, that diverse physical and chemical properties of substances
In many respects are determined by this quantity.
This constant remained unknown in modern physics and
on Feynman’s expression , which he said with humour
that this quantity is
‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘.
====================
We know how whole Universe was created from
the first second ( from big bang , of course).
But on simple question :
‘ What is an electron ?’,
‘ What is a formula of an electron ?’
we don't have answer.
It would be much more logical at first to understand
what an electron is and then to answer a question:
‘How was whole Universe created ?’
===============. .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
================ . .
P.S.
The world of electron.
But maybe these electrons are World,
where there are five continents:
the art,
knowledge,
wars,
thrones
and the memory of forty centuries.
/ V. Brusov./
==============…
==================== . .
#
In the early decades after Einstein introduced his SRT, the standard
practice was to make a distinction between rest mass and relativistic
mass, and many teacher who learned from old texts and older
professors have not yet broken that habit.
Among scientists who deal with relativity in practical situations
daily, no such distinction is made. Mass is just mass; the mass
of a particle increases as it is accelerated, and there is no need
to distinguish between the rest mass and the total mass.
#
SRT is Special Relativity Theory, but I agree with billsuss'
premise It seems that some people really don't like to make
themselves clear when asking a question. This question
is a perfect example of that.
#
Please login or register to participate.