Predators zoom in on lice-infested salmon
Parasite picked up near fish farms may harm wild juveniles in unexpected ways
font_down font_up Text Size
access
THE LICE LIFEYoung wild salmon that pick up sea lice near fish farms engage in riskier behavior than their lice-free counterpartsIMAGE CREDIT: Alexandra Morton

CHICAGO — Young lice-infested wild salmon not only bear the burden of a parasite load, but they are also more likely to get snapped up by predators than their clean schoolmates, new research shows.

The research, presented February 15 at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, adds to a growing body of evidence that aquaculture, which ideally would take pressure off wild fish stocks, may harm some wild populations in unexpected ways. Scientists are still untangling the web of interactions between farmed and wild fish — a web that includes parasites, antibiotics, feed fish and the humans who scarf down more than 9 million metric tons of farmed fish every year.

When juvenile, 1-inch–long pink and chum salmon swim down the rivers of the Pacific Northwest toward the open sea, many pass aquaculture pens that dot coastal inlets. Normally, there is little overlap of adult and juvenile habitats — the young and old fish travel in different circles — and most fish don’t pick up parasites such as sea lice until they are adults. But when the wild juveniles swim through fish farm territory, the sea lice that are prevalent in the close quarters of aquaculture pens can glom onto the juveniles.

Not only do the lice suck the lifeblood from the young fish, but the wounds are also an open door for harmful bacteria and viruses. Previous research suggests that juvenile mortality linked to lice-infested farms can be as high as 95 percent, says Martin Krkošek of the University of Washington in Seattle.

Now Krkošek reports that infested fish engage in riskier behaviors, making them more likely to become dinner for the 3- to 4-inch–long coho salmon smolts, a primary predator of the pink and chum juveniles.

Krkošek and his colleagues set up tanks with small schools of the juveniles, some of which were infected with sea lice. The scientists trained the fish to expect food in the exposed center of the tank, occasionally simulating a predator strike by having a fake bird dive down into the tank. Healthy fish quickly scattered, bolting for cover under the fake kelp in the tanks’ corners, but lice-burdened fish took longer to seek shelter, Krkošek says. Infested fish also were more inclined to swim in the exposed positions in the school, hanging toward the outside of the group and lagging behind their closest neighbors, making it easier for predators to see the fish and strike.

It isn't clear whether the selective removal of infested fish by predators dampens the negative effects of the lice by clearing out sick salmon or if this culling exacerbates mortality, says Krkošek.

Lice are just one of the ills of farmed salmon, Krkošek notes.

The high density of penned fish makes it easier for bacteria and viruses to spread, which often leads to heavy use of antibiotics on fish farms.

“When you crowd animals together, they tend to get sick,” he says.

Aquaculture is the new frontier of excessive antibiotic use, says Felipe Cabello of New York Medical College in Valhalla, who also presented at the conference. The practice fosters the growth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which threaten human health. Bacteria acquire resistance by picking up little circular bits of DNA called plasmids that can carry genes for resistance. He cited a recent study of the diversity of tetracycline-resistant bacteria in Chilean salmon farms that found that 40 percent of the resistance genes had never been described before.

Fish farming offers an opportunity to take pressure off of wild fish stocks and to feed the world’s growing population. But many scientists contend that farms should concentrate on shellfish and fin fish low on the food chain. Farming carnivores such as salmon doesn’t add up — more fish need to be extracted from the oceans to make the food for farmed salmon than is produced by the farms.

John Volpe of the University of Victoria in British Columbia, who also presented at the conference, is part of a research team that’s spearheading a consistent way of assessing the sustainability of aquaculture operations. The Global Aquaculture Performance Index evaluates a country’s fish farms using several parameters, such as water quality and the amount of disease and parasites. Currently the global production of farmed fish is growing, with the bulk of farmed species made up of fish that are high in the food chain and need to be fed other fish. "It's farming the tigers of the sea," Volpe says.


Found in: Agriculture, Environment and Science & Society
Comments 3
  • This is a classic case of marine zoologists being decades behind beginner aquarium hobbyists. All basic texts for new entrants into the aquarium hobby warns against overcrowding. Not only does overcrowding cause immune system disruption, it makes the fish easy targets for parasites once the immune system is weakened. Unless antibiotics are used, the entire population usually expires. This would be no different in farmed populations. What is different is that in an aquarium, the parasites can't escape into the environment. In a farmed environment, the pens would be essentially factory farms for parasites, not fish. The biggest exports would be parasites and they would wash out of the pens in dense clouds far more able to infect wild stock. Once infected, the wild stocks would then be doomed. Of course not all fish in a given wild population would die. But since salmon school and since the parasites would be in much denser than normal quantities, the death toll would be correspondingly higher. The threat to wild stocks is huge.

    Removal of infected fish by predators is no real answer because the predators can also become infected. Many parasites are passed on from host to host as prey fish are consumed. Fish lice for instance can live quite well in the gill rakers of even modest sized fish. Fish lice are like moles. They tunnel through the host creating tunnels throughout the fish body. The fish dies when a vital organ is impacted in an aquarium. In the wild, the affected fish wouldn't live that long because a predator would catch and eat it - and the parasites. In the meantime the host fish is packed with Fish lice eggs or whatever other parasites that were resident.

    While it's commonly thought that fish farming is taking the pressure off wild populations; that is a fantasy.

    The world human population is growing too fast for fish farming and wild stock combined to keep up for long.

    The planet's fish stocks are being systematically destroyed one after the other and the habitats are being scraped clean by the chains that drag along the bottom. That not only removes the fish, it precludes those former habitats from supporting any future populations for decades.

    Removing shellfish and other fish from lower on the food chain is no answer either. Shell fish are the bio-filters that keep the water and the substrate clean. Remove too many of them and aquatic eco-systems would collapse and so would terrestrial eco-systems eventually as a direct result.

    Removing the smaller fish would mean depriving the natural prey from the predators. That would impact predator (salmon) numbers.

    What scientists don't get is the math. The natural world is not a grocery store for humans. When humans extract a living resource from an eco-system, that eco-system collapses at least in part. Just because aquatic creatures live mostly out of sight doesn't mean that our harvesting is without impact. What it means is the planet is merely a larger version of Easter Island. There is no getting off and when the food is gone, we will have no choice eventually but to start eating each other just like the isolated population of Easter Island had to after wiping out all of their local natural resources including trees and chickens. They were left with nothing substantial to eat but each other. The entire planet is now racing to that sorry fate.
    John  Newell John Newell
    Feb. 20, 2009 at 10:08pm
  • The next thing that would happen in wild stocks that eating densely infected fish would increase predator mortality. Eventually as predator populations collapse the prey populations get sicker and eventually die. Entire populations in aquariums get wiped out in this manner. It would take longer in the wild but eventually, the results would have to be the same. Fish farming is fish husbandry by the piscatorially uneducated dabbling in processes that will substantially harm the planet. My advice is that a few of the marine biologists try keeping a few guppies under fish farming conditions and see what happens. The result without intervention is always annihilation.

    No one can medicate the ocean. And if they did that would change its chemistry. Using drugs on farmed fish ought to be illegal. But then oceanic fish farms could not survive - and that would be a very good thing from a planetary perspective.
    John  Newell John Newell
    Feb. 20, 2009 at 10:17pm
  • Was this study funded by the purveyors of much more expensive wild salmon as most of the previous studies were?
    ART DAY ART DAY
    Feb. 23, 2009 at 12:22am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator