Sponge’s secret weapon restores antibiotics’ power
Bacteria treated with compound lose their resistance
font_down font_up Text Size
CHICAGO — A chemical from an ocean-dwelling sponge can reprogram antibiotic resistant bacteria to make them vulnerable to medicines again, new evidence suggests.

Ineffective antibiotics become lethal once again for bacteria treated with the sponge compound, chemist Peter Moeller reported February 13 at the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting.

“The potential is outstanding. This could revolutionize our approach to thinking about how infections are treated,” comments Carolyn Sotka of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Oceans and Human Health Initiative in Charleston, S.C.

Everything living in the ocean survives in a microbial soup, under constant bombardment from bacterial assaults. Researchers led by Moeller, of Hollings Marine Laboratory in Charleston, found a sponge thriving in the midst of dead organisms. This anomalous life amidst death raised an obvious question, says Moeller: “How is this thing surviving when everything else is dead?”

Chemical analyses of the sponge’s chemical defense factory pointed to a compound called ageliferin. Biofilms, communities of bacteria notoriously resistant to antibiotics, dissolved when treated with fragments of the ageliferin molecule. And new biofilms did not form.

So far, the ageliferin offshoot has, in the lab, successfully resensitized bacteria that cause whooping cough, ear infections, septicemia and food poisoning. The compound also works on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which causes horrible infections in wounded soldiers, and MRSA infections, which wreak havoc in hospitals. “We have yet to find one that doesn’t work,” says Moeller.  

And the results may not just apply to bacteria in communities. The compound is able to reprogram antibiotic-resistant bacteria that don’t form biofilms. When bacteria are treated with the compound, antibiotics that usually have no effect are once again lethal. This substance may be the first one that can eliminate bacteria's resistance, Moeller says. “This resensitization is brand new.”

And the problem of perpetuating a bacterial-resistance arms race, in which bacteria rapidly develop countermeasures against new antibiotics, may be avoided entirely with the new compound. “Since the substance is nontoxic to the bacterium, it’s not throwing up any red flags,” says Moeller.

Other than “doing something really funky that we’re excited about,” researchers don’t yet know how this compound interferes with bacterial resistance to antibiotics, says Moeller. The compound may sneak by bacteria’s sensors that trigger new ways to combat antibiotics. Bacteria continually treated with this compound for three months are still susceptible to antibiotics.

The research is still in very early phases.

“Everyone would like to see this in antibiotic trials tomorrow,” Moeller says, but treatments for human infections are a long way off.

Sotka agrees. “Of course, we need clinical trials to take it to the next level,” she says.
Found in: Life and Molecules
Comments 4
  • The problem of perpetuating a bacterial-resistance arms race... may be avoided entirely with the new compound. “Since the substance is nontoxic to the bacterium, it’s not throwing up any red flags,”

    Yes, it is, too, throwing up red flags. Bacteria that are exposed to it then die when encountering antibiotics. Some bacteria exposed to less than a 100% effective dose will survive and their offspring will be a new partially resistant generation to select from. While we may dream, we can't fool Mother Nature.
    Daniel Miller Daniel Miller
    Feb. 15, 2009 at 4:25pm
  • There is a mistake in this article. I believe that "MSRA" should be "MRSA" Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. On the other had this is great news and will be a new frontier in healthcare!
    Carroll  Christie Carroll Christie
    Feb. 16, 2009 at 1:20pm
  • Another error is here:
    This substance may be the first one that can restore bacterial resistance, Moeller says. “This resensitization is brand new.”

    Surely the writer meant "...restore bacterial antibiotic sensitivity" or something of that sort. Bacteria are already resistant to antibiotics, so the author must mean that the resistance is reversed, not restored. Where is the editor?

    BioSci
    BioSci BioSci
    Feb. 16, 2009 at 8:22pm
  • Daniel Miller,

    What the scientist are saying is that, so far the doses, no matter the amount or the amount of time they have been exposed, are 100% effective. They have yet to find a bacterium that does not re-sensitize when given the chemical. All of the bacteria that are given the chemical die when given antibiotics. For these bacteria, there will be no offspring.
    Tyler Albers Tyler Albers
    Feb. 19, 2009 at 4:37pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator