Kids' gestures foretell better vocabularies
Language acquisition may begin even before children start saying many words
font_down font_up Text Size
access
POINT AND LEARNA new study finds a link between a kindergartner's vocabulary strength and how often that child gestured at age 14 months.IMAGE: copyright Science/AAAS

CHICAGO — Anyone who has witnessed a 3-year-old imitate a rude hand signal from his car seat knows that young children are perfectly capable of picking up gestures from adults. New research suggests that 14-month-old children who gesture more will go on to have higher vocabularies by the time kindergarten begins, researchers reported February 12 at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The research also appears in the Feb. 13 Science.

“Children on the first day of school vary greatly in vocabulary,” Susan Goldin-Meadow of the University of Chicago, coauthor of the study, said in a news briefing February 12. “The question is, why?”

Goldin-Meadow and colleague Meredith Rowe, also of the University of Chicago, studied 50 families representing the economic and educational levels in the greater Chicago area. For 90 minutes at a time, researchers videotaped everyday interactions in the home between a 14-month-old child and the primary caregiver, who was almost always the mother. Researchers then tallied the number of gestures with a clear associated meaning, like a child pointing at a cup or nodding his head.

“At 14 months, you can’t see a difference in speech,” says Goldin-Meadow. But researchers did detect what Rowe calls “striking differences” between the number of meaningful gestures children from wealthier, educated families made and the number children from poorer, less educated families made.

Children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds performed an average of 13 meaningful gestures during each 90 minute session, while kids from higher socioeconomic families averaged 24. “The number almost doubles,” says Rowe. The numbers of gestures from caregivers was also greater in the higher socioeconomic group, suggesting that children pick the gestures up from caregivers.

Researchers later tested the children’s vocabularies at age 54 months, right around when children start school. Children who had gestured more at a younger age scored significantly higher on vocabulary tests.

“This is excellent work,” comments Erika Hoff of Florida Atlantic University in Davie. She says the finding is interesting because it shows that language acquisition begins well before children start to say very much.

Children whose parents speak to them more are known to have higher vocabularies. But gesturing also affects vocabulary, even when all speech effects are removed from the analysis, the researchers say. Gesturing effects go above and beyond speech effects, says Goldin-Meadow.

The researchers point out that these results do not prove that gesturing causes high vocabulary, just that the two are correlated.

A child’s gestures may spark more “teachable moments,” creating opportunities for verbal reinforcement of ideas. “The child points at a dog and the parent says, ‘Yes, that’s a dog,’” says Rowe.

Research from Goldin-Meadow's team also suggests that gesturing may encourage children to think more creatively by bringing out new ideas and improving clarity. By manipulating how much children gestured, researchers gauged the influence of gesturing. Older children told to gesture while solving math problems on a chalkboard got the answer right more frequently than children who were told not to gesture. “These gestures are not mere hand waving. Kids are extracting meaning from gestures,” says Goldin-Meadow. “The educational relevance could be fabulous."

Children with a poorer vocabulary go on to do worse in all subjects in school, says Rowe. And unfortunately, “the gap doesn’t get smaller. It’s going to grow and get worse. What we’re doing is trying to understand when this gap first starts.”

Rowe and her colleagues plan to continue following the children until they enter the fifth grade.


Found in: Behavior and Humans
Comments 5
  • I suppose children gestures are a way of them trying to put front words. So when they gesture they are actually speaking through movements. Children who gesture more are a potential of a child that will aquire a more broad vocabulary. Obviously socioeconomic factors influence this aquisiton as education is a consequence of living in better circumstances.
    Sofia Luz Sofia Luz
    Feb. 13, 2009 at 9:07am
  • Having done my master's thesis on children's acquisition of language, I would say that with some kids, at least, one does indeed see language differences as early as 14 months. I did. Subject A was speaking one word at a time, with a vocabulary of perhaps 20 words at that age, as well as several gestures. Subject B was not yet using any words at that age and would not for several more months, but was using a number of gestures as well. At school age, both had large vocabularies and did well, although B was generally slower at acquiring each grammatical feature and more reliant on gestures to clarity meaning throughout the preschool years. Mama spoke to both all day long, SES was lower middle class, and both kids eventually obtained college degrees. How's that for a long-term study?
    Diana Gainer Diana Gainer
    Feb. 13, 2009 at 9:19am
  • This study, and I underline the word study, as opposed to personal observation, again underlines that given our meritocratic society, based on intelligence, of which one component is language ability, intelligence and social class are related. Other studies have shown that schooling does not overcome this difference, in terms of money spent per student. There is ample evidence that intelligence is inherited from studies of monozygotic twins reared apart. So, given that we live on a planet that cannot adequately support all its inhabitants, shouldn't we be discouraging poor parents from having children in order to conserve resources and improve the likelihood that children of wealthier parents actually have a governable, habitable planet to grow up on?
    Jonathan Freedman Jonathan Freedman
    Feb. 13, 2009 at 11:24am
  • This is an excellent article about teaching language to children.

    It is something the families of dyslexic children have known for decades. The Orton-Gillingham Multisensory Method of language instruction has been in use since the 1930s and is one of the few methods (if not the only method) shown to work for dyslexics.

    Words and phrases are accentuated by gestures and other visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic cues.

    It is not surprising that what works for dyslexic children would work for the general population.
    P. Perspectoff P. Perspectoff
    Feb. 13, 2009 at 11:39am
  • Re:Johnathan Freedman's relatively uniformed comments.

    Intelligence is highly heritable. as much as.80. in an optimized middle class environment, which is the one almost all MZAs (Mono-Zygotic twins raised Apart)used in twin studies have grown up in. When socio-economic environment is controlled for the heritability for general intelligence may be as low as .2 in MZAs.

    It also is a stretch to claim that measures of high general intelligence and/or wealth have have a strong correlation with how governable, honest, or nonviolent (and therefore how governable) people may be, as measured by standard personality tests.

    Even widely accepted measures of general intelligence such as IQ tests have to be normed every ten years because the environment of our ever more sophisticated culture changes the social utility of certain skills that affect IQ scores. This is all standard knowledge.See What is Intelligence by James Flynn.

    Jay Hutchins
    Jay  Hutchins Jay Hutchins
    Feb. 13, 2009 at 4:20pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator