- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Contrary to the findings of previous studies, much of Antarctica has warmed in recent decades — and it has done so substantially, at rates similar to the global average rise in temperature.
Most Antarctic weather stations, with the exception of those at the South Pole and Lake Vostok, lie along the coast of the forbidding continent, says Eric Steig, a climatologist at the University of Washington in Seattle. Although coastal regions, on average, have warmed in recent decades, weather stations at the South Pole and Lake Vostok in the continent’s interior — two data points that represent an area the size of the lower 48 United States — have cooled. “Lacking more data, scientists have presumed that most of the surrounding area was cooling as well,” says Steig.
Now, to assess long-term climate trends for the entire icy continent, Steig and his colleagues blended meteorological data from 42 weather stations available since 1957 with satellite data gathered since 1982.
The researchers report in the Jan. 22 Nature that most of Antarctica, like much of the rest of the world, has substantially warmed in recent decades.
The new findings suggest that “the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is more vulnerable [to warming] than we had previously thought,” says Drew Shindell, a climatologist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City and coauthor of the new study.
The team’s analyses also reveal that a small region of East Antarctica, a swath that includes weather stations at the South Pole and Lake Vostok that are far from the coast, indeed cooled slightly between 1957 and 2006.
But overall, East Antarctica as a whole — an area that accounts for about three-quarters of the continent and that has an average elevation around 3,000 meters — warmed about 0.1 degrees Celsius during that same interval. For comparison, global average temperature has risen about 0.6 degrees Celsius, or around 0.12 degrees per decade, since 1957, says Shindell.
The largest rate of warming revealed in the new study, however, showed up in West Antarctica, where the average elevation is only about 1,800 meters. In this smaller area, the average temperature rose about 0.17 degrees Celsius per decade from 1957 to 2006. The region’s Antarctic Peninsula — a finger of land that points toward South America and the place many scientists believed the continent’s warming to be concentrated — has warmed more slowly, only 0.11 degrees Celsius per decade since 1957.
West Antarctica’s warming has happened recently, the researchers speculate, in large part because sea-ice coverage off this region’s coast has dropped significantly in the last 25 years. That, in turn, has buffeted the region with storms carrying warm winds, Shindell says. Satellite data indicate that small patches of snow atop the West Antarctic ice sheet have melted briefly in recent years, Steig notes.
“The new results, and especially their spatial and seasonal patterns, indicate that there’s warming related to greenhouse gases on all seven of Earth’s continents,” Shindell says.
“This study makes an incremental contribution to a growing body of work that suggests that Antarctic climate is being influenced by humans,” agrees Andrew Monaghan, an atmospheric scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo.
Strong warming in West Antarctica “is a particularly important finding,” Monaghan adds: Many field studies in that Greenland-sized chunk of the continent have noted the acceleration of large glaciers in recent years. While some scientists have attributed that speed-up to ocean warmth at the seaward end of those ice streams, the new findings suggest that atmospheric warming may be contributing to the acceleration as well.
Found in: Earth Science
- Perkins, S. 2007. Fits and Starts: What regulates the flow of huge ice streams? Science News 171(March 31):202. Available to subscribers at [Go to]
- Perkins, S. 2001. Antarctic glacier thins and speeds up. Science News 159(Feb. 3):70. Available at [Go to]
- Steig, E.J., et al. 2009. Warming of the Antarctic ice-sheet surface since the 1957 International Geophysical Year. Nature 457(Jan. 22):459.


"... we often hear people remarking that parts of Antarctica are getting
colder, and indeed the ice pack in the Southern Ocean around Antarctica
has actually been getting bigger. Doesn't this contradict the
calculations that greenhouse gases are warming the globe? Not at all,
because a cold Antarctica is just what calculations predict... and have
predicted for the past quarter century...
... computer models have improved by orders of magnitude, but they
continue to show that Antarctica cannot be expected to warm up very
significantly until long after the rest of the world's climate is
radically changed.
Bottom line: A cold Antarctica and Southern Ocean do not contradict our
models of global warming. For a long time the models have predicted just
that."
Handy, no?
"Is Antarctic Warming Real or is it “Mann”-made?
The report of an unexpected Antarctic warming trend [Eric J. Steig, David P. Schneider, Scott D. Rutherford, Michael E. Mann, Josefino C. Comiso & Drew T. Shindell. Warming of the Antarctic ice-sheet surface since the 1957 International Geophysical Year. Nature 457:459-463, 22 Jan. 2009; doi:10.1038/nature07669] has created a certain amount of skepticism – even among supporters of AGW.
But in an AP news story, two of its authors (one is ‘hockey-stick’ inventor Michael Mann from the Real Climate blog) argue that this refutes the skeptics and is "consistent with" greenhouse warming. Of course, as Roger Pielke, Jr, points out, not long ago we learned from Real Climate that a cooling Antarctica was ‘consistent with’ greenhouse warming and thus the skeptics were wrong: “So a warming Antarctica and a cooling Antarctica are both ‘consistent with’ model projections of global warming. Our foray into the tortured logic of ‘consistent with’ in climate science raises the perennial question, what observations of the climate system would be inconsistent with the model predictions?”
The results are based on very few isolated data from weather stations, plus data from research satellites. And here is the rub: these are not data from microwave sounding units (MSU), such as are regularly published by Christy and Spencer, but data from infrared sensors that are supposed to measure the temperature of the surface (rather than of the overlaying atmosphere, as weather stations do).
But the IR emission depends not only on temperature of the surface, but also on surface emissivity -- and is further modified by absorption of clouds and haze.
These are all difficult points. Emissivity of snow depends on its porosity and size of snow crystals. Blowing snow likely has a different emissivity than snow that has been tamped down; so surface winds could have a strong influence. The emissivity of ice is again different and will depend on whether there is a thin melt layer of water on top of the ice, temporarily produced by solar radiation. Finally, we have temperature inversions that can trap haze which is essentially undetectable by optical methods from satellites.
The proof of the pudding, of course, is the MSU data, which show a continuous cooling trend, are little affected by surface conditions and are unaffected by haze and clouds. They are therefore more reliable."
It is to bad that Science News has jumped on the GW bandwagon and won't bother to present both sides of this issue when there are highly qualified scientists who would obviously be more than happy to comment on such a report. Generally Science News tries to get different points of view from scientists who are skeptical of research reports. Apparently this is no longer true for this subject - a sad day in science journalism.
Applies to some staff at Penn State. Sad...
And this nonsense passed peer review? Oh please!
I suppose that it does serve a political purpose, however, and, as usual, it pulled in SN hook, line, and sinker.
Please login or register to participate.