Baby boys may show spatial supremacy
Male superiority on mental rotation tasks may develop within a few months after birth
font_down font_up Text Size
access
NEW ANGLES ON BLOCKSHow long babies spent time looking at rotated blocks and the mirror images of blocks was a measure of the ability to mentally rotate an object.IMAGE CREDIT: Robert M. Ditto

The gender gap in spatial abilities — charted for more than 30 years — emerges within the first few months of life, years earlier than previously thought, psychologists report.

Males typically outperform females on spatial-ability tests by age 4, especially on tasks that require mental rotation of objects perceived as three-dimensional. Yet,

two studies of 3- to 5-month-olds, both published in the November Psychological Science, conclude that a substantially greater proportion of boys than girls distinguish a block arrangement from its mirror image, after having first seen the block arrangement rotated. Babies who prefer looking at the mirror image are presumed to have mentally rotated the block arrangement, recognized it and chosen to gaze at the novel mirror image.

One investigation was conducted by David Moore of Pitzer College in Claremont, Calif., and Scott Johnson of the University of California, Los Angeles. The other was directed by Paul Quinn of the University of Delaware in Newark and Lynn Liben of Pennsylvania State University in University Park.

Both sets of researchers suspect that sex differences in mental rotation develop shortly after birth due to an unknown mix of genetic, biological and environmental influences.

“The result we found was really somewhat of a shocker,” Moore says. He had expected to demonstrate no sex difference in infants’ mental rotation skills, laying the groundwork for pinpointing the age at which this spatial gap first appears.

“Simultaneous reports by two different labs using two different techniques are difficult to dismiss,” remarks psychologist Nora Newcombe of Temple University in Philadelphia.

Still, the new reports don’t confirm that baby boys perform mental rotation tasks better than baby girls do, comments psychologist Susan Levine of the University of Chicago. That’s because both studies first familiarized babies with a block arrangement oriented at specific angles but then presented it from a new angle for comparison with its mirror image, a process that may mask baby girls’ spatial insights.

By 3 months of age, girls — but not boys — may notice changes in a block arrangement’s angle, Levine proposes. If so, girls would regard both a newly oriented block arrangement and its mirror image as novel, spending roughly equal amounts of time looking at both. Scientists have yet to address this possibility, she says.

If infant boys don’t notice angle shifts, they would spend most of the time looking at novel mirror images, Levine suggests. Baby boys would thus falsely appear to be better than baby girls at mental rotation.

“Even if there is an early advantage in favor of males, there is ample research showing that mental rotation skill is malleable,” Levine says. Preschool activities such as block building, assembling jigsaw puzzles and playing certain video games have been linked to stronger mental rotation skill. In 2005, Levine reported that second- and third-graders from poor families, who receive little or no exposure to such activities, show no sex difference in the ability to mentally rotate an object.

Some parents play with their children and babies in ways that promote spatial thinking, such as naming the shapes of toys and guiding a child’s hand to rotate a toy, notes Penn State’s Liben. It’s not known whether parents target such behavior at boys, she says.

Researchers have yet to show that early proficiency on mental rotation tasks translates into an aptitude for spatially challenging subjects such as geometry, geography and science, Levine cautions.

Moore and Johnson showed 20 boys and 20 girls, all 5 months old, videos of a block arrangement rotating back and forth through a 240° angle. Each child sat in his or her mother’s lap as the mother kept her eyes closed. After tiring of looking at this image, infants saw alternating videos of the original block arrangement or its mirror image rotating through a 120° angle.

Video records of infants’ gaze and head movements revealed that 14 boys, or 70 percent of them, preferred looking at mirror images, compared with 9 girls, or 45 percent of them.

Quinn and Liben showed 12 boys and 12 girls, all 3 to 4 months old, a series of images of either a black number 1 or its mirror image, each drawn to appear three-dimensional and situated at a different degree of rotation. Each baby then saw presentations of both the number 1 and its mirror image in a new degree of rotation.

In the latter trials, 11 boys preferred looking at the image that they hadn’t seen before, compared with 5 girls.

It may be possible to study mental rotation in babies within the first few days after birth, Quinn says.


Found in: Behavior and Humans
Comments 4
  • This is an interesting sort of test, but did they test the same infants on other skills? I wonder about this because my two babies, a girl and boy, had the same sets of toys, which included sets of toy people which could be inserted in toy vehicles; Lego toys from which they could construct various things such as 'houses'; and stuffed toys. The girl preferred to play with the toy people and disregarded the vehicles most of the time. The boy preferred to play with the toy vehicles and disregarded the people most of the time. But sometimes both put the toy people in the toy cars and planes. If the object rotation skill is indeed better in boys, early on, perhaps the girls are bettering their people-rotation skill at that age. Daughter knew me from the back as well as the front and side, after all, and she never objected to me lying down, squatting, getting down on all fours, crawling, or even standing on my head. Son only wanted me to stand up or sit erect in a chair. He was over a year old before he'd accept me roaming on all fours with him riding me like a horsie. Hm! Mama-rotation troubles?
    Diana Gainer Diana Gainer
    Nov. 26, 2008 at 12:00pm
  • I wonder what Larry Sommers would say about this.
    Colin Purrington Colin Purrington
    Dec. 3, 2008 at 6:11am



  • Male fetuses are more likely to be miscarried or born prematurely than females, and premature babies are at higher risk of death. So more male fetuses don't make it through the pregnancy or die shortly after premature birth. Tummy Tub might be something parents with newborn children might look into. Stress affects men's reproductive systems, too. Some experts believe stress can slow down sperm motility. That, in turn, might result in fewer XY-chromosome-carrying sperm -- normally the faster swimmers that create male babies -- reaching the egg. Bad economic times were like earthquakes, leading to a similar sex ratio imbalance. If we look at the sex ratio in East and West Germany from 1946 to 1999, the two Germanys reunited in 1990, but in 1991, after the collapse of the economy of the former East Germany, fewer boys than normal were born there; the natural balance held in the former West Germany. Gestation is very sensitive to the environment. Fewer males are born and the effects on reproduction go further than that, coitus is less frequent. One of the principal consequences of economic decline is lowered libido."
    Click for more info: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/05/01/tummy-tubs/



    Jeremiah Eee Jeremiah Eee
    May. 8, 2009 at 4:58am
  • Yes, when it comes to other things like mental development boys are superior but when it comes to physical growth girls are superior.
    http://ultrareview.net
    http://startwebsite.org

    Tom Schavo Tom Schavo
    Nov. 13, 2009 at 5:14am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Levine, S., et al. 2005. Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science 16(November):841-845. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01623.x
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Quinn, P., and L. Liben. 2008. A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychological Science 19(November).
  • Moore, D., and S. Johnson. 2008. Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science 19(November).
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator