- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Every now and then, I attend a conference and run across
some news I can use. Often, as today, passing reference to the theme emerged in
sessions that my table-mates then pick up on at lunch. Today’s dining chat
centered on the operational life of technologies we use to store our growing
libraries of digital photos and videos. The bottom line: Don’t store files on
DVDs, I learned, unless you’re prepared to dump the disks every three months
and create new ones from your original source files.
CDs will store your digital pix longer — maybe a year.
Now, I’m quite sure there are cadres of digital mavens for whom this is old,
old hat. Certainly, the other guys at my lunch table — all attendees, here in
I know what you’re probably thinking. That music CD of ABBA’s later hits,
purchased when the Swedes were winding up their active period in the early
‘80s, still plays on the rare occasion you take it out for a trip down
nostalgia lane. But that’s because manufacturers do a better job, as a rule, of
protecting their files on commercially recorded, play-only CDs, Tarrant
explains. The download-it-yourself CDs are another story, he says. And the
record-it-yourself DVDs, they can start degrading substantially within a year.
So where do people like Tarrant, who investigates ways to preserve digital
repositories of potentially invaluable files — such as research data —
recommend keeping family pix or other digital memorabilia that we hope to save
for all eternity? CDs are fine, he says. Just keep backing them up every year.
And “migrate” the original files from your old hard drive to a brand new hard
drive every two to four years.
Of course, Tarrant seems like a stickler for authenticity, that is, keeping
data from any unintended alteration. Most of us can probably live with the loss
of a few bytes here or there. Maybe it will alter a color somewhat or give us a
microhole — absence of data — in the winter coat Aunt Sarah was wearing the
last time we took her snapshot. But expecting all of our libraries of photos to
sleep safely within those CDs on the shelf: That’s apparently folly.
It also argues against putting them in a time capsule. Even without using them,
they’ll just degrade before the next generation retrieves them. Much like those
old mid-century photographic slides did that dad saved on the closet shelf.
I just wish that all of those people who have been pushing digital cameras on
us for the past decade, hawking them as “better than film,” had warned us that
their products would be so ephemeral.
Found in: Materials Science and Science & Society
-
This is depressing. After going to digital photography in 2001, I have generated DVD slideshows with audio for several major vacation trips. I had believed that with proper storage they would last for decades, and indeed the earliest ones still seem to work fine at age 7 years. Life is too short to reburn these DVDs every 3 months!
Gus Carlson
Jul. 11, 2008 at 12:05pm -
Gee, those consumer-grade CD-R's that I store in my car, that go through all those heat/cold cycles, that I recorded in 2003, still play fine...so far.
Pluton
Jul. 8, 2008 at 10:16pm -
Whet sort of nonsense info is this? That recorded dvd's last three months and CD's a year. According to the Optical Storage Technology Association (OSTA) DVD+-R have a manufacturers' estimated recorded life span of 30-100 years. And for CD-R it's 50-200 years.
mamon
Jul. 7, 2008 at 3:30pm -
The point of digital storage is not that the media are more durable than analog media; they aren't. But the data can last forever if properly cared for, because digital data (unlike analog) can be copied to new media without generational loss of fidelity. That's the point of going digital: to liberate data from media so it can be freely duplicated, backed up, migrated to new media, and thus preserved against loss in ways that analog data, permanently married to its media, never can be.
Gregory Kusnick
Jun. 18, 2008 at 6:28pm -
Well, that makes me feel better about the 20 or so rolls of 35mm I shot in the past two weeks. -Ben Harder
benharder
Jun. 18, 2008 at 10:19am
