A close-up examination of crystal skulls reveals the true, recent origins of these "relics"

CRYSTAL COUNTERFEITNew research indicates that this crystal skull, housed at the Smithsonian Institution, was made in the 1950s, not by Aztecs more than 500 years ago as some have thought.Smithsonian Institution/James Di Loreto
Indiana Jones might have saved himself a whole lot of trouble
in his new movie if only he had known the crystal skulls he traveled so far to
find were probably fakes.
Crystal skulls, carved from a
see-through mineral called quartz, have been thought by some scholars to be
relics of the Aztecs or other peoples living in Central
America about 500 years ago, between the 14th and 16th
centuries. The stuff of legends, the skulls’ otherworldly appearance has even
led some to believe that they have healing properties and came not from Aztecs
but from a mysterious civilization that disappeared from the Earth long ago.
Some even suggest the skulls, which Europeans began collecting in the
mid-1800s, came from another planet entirely.
It turns out the skulls’ origins are probably much more
humble. Museum historians and archaeologists have long suspected that crystal
skulls, especially large ones, may be modern-day forgeries and not the objects
of a bygone civilization. Most of the life-sized crystal skulls found in
museums have no documents recording where, when or how they were dug up, or who
originally found them. The large size of the skulls also stands out from the
much smaller skull carvings more commonly found in Aztec dig sites. These
observations long raised many peoples' suspicions about the skulls. Are they
really as old as their collectors say they are?
To find out, a team of archaeologists recently analyzed two
life-sized crystal skulls, one housed in the British
Museum in London,
and the other at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C.
By closely examining the surface of the skulls, the researchers determined what
kinds of tools were used to make the skulls. For comparison, they also examined
the surfaces of several beads and a drinking cup collected from archaeological
digs at Central American spots known to be between 1,000 and 500 years old.
To get a close-up look at the surface of each object, the
researchers used a tool called a scanning electron microscope. This
high-magnification tool sends a beam of electrons through an object to form an
image. To work properly, the object scanned needs to be coated with a very thin
layer of gold, which helps conduct the electron beam through the sample. Rather
than coat the museum specimens with gold, the team pressed a type of wax onto
the surface of each specimen to make a precise mold. Viewing this wax mold with
the powerful magnification provided by a scanning electron microscope gave the
researchers a very detailed view. They were able to look carefully at the fine
markings left behind by the tools used to make the skulls, as well as the beads
and cup.
Under magnification, the cup and beads have the kinds of
markings that would come from wood and stone tools. They were shallow and
irregular, as you might expect from a piece carved by hand. The skulls, however,
had more uniform surface patterns. The researchers say the pattern found on one
of the skulls is the same kind of pattern produced by a more modern tool — a mechanical
wheel like those used by jewelry-makers today. This suggests the large skulls
were carved with modern equipment that would not have been available to the
people living long ago, says Jane Walsh, an anthropologist at the Smithsonian
Institution.
Further analysis of the quartz in the other skull suggested
the rock it was made from came from Madagascar,
Europe or Brazil
— all very far from the Aztec empire, and not at all connected to the empire by
any trade network. Taken together, these pieces of evidence support the idea
that the life-sized crystal skulls are modern-day phonies.
What about the many smaller crystal skulls housed in other
museums around the world? Walsh says they're probably fakes, too. But
archaeologist Michael E. Smith at Arizona
State University
thinks otherwise. While he agrees the large skulls are probably fakes, "some
small crystal skulls may indeed be legitimate Aztec objects," he says.
Power words:
Archaeologist: a
scientist who studies past human lives and cultures. Archaeologists study
tools, clothing and other artifacts of ancient civilizations.
Anthropologist: a
scientist who studies humans. An anthropologist studies culture, customs and
how the first humans developed.
Aztec: a name for
a group of native American peoples and cultures that dominated central Mexico
from the 14th to the 16th century.
Quartz: a
colorless mineral made of silica and oxygen. Quartz is the most common mineral
on Earth.
Found in: Archaeology, Molecules and Science News For Kids
Shouldn't this be:
...made of silicon and oxygen...
Silica is silicon dioxide.