- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Gold comes in many colors. Since ancient times, glass
artists and alchemists alike have known how to grind the metal into fine
particles that would take on hues such as red or mauve. At scales even smaller,
clusters of just a few dozen atoms display even more outlandish behavior. Gold
and certain other atoms often tend to aggregate in specific numbers and highly
symmetrical geometries, and sometimes these clusters can mimic the chemistry of
single atoms of a completely different element. They become, as some
researchers say, superatoms.
Recently researchers have reported successes in creating new
superatoms and deciphering their structures. In certain conditions, even
familiar molecules such as buckyballs — the soccer-ball–shaped cages
made of 60 carbon atoms — unexpectedly turn into
superatoms.
Scientists are already studying how superatoms bind to each
other and to organic molecules. Tracking superatoms can help researchers learn
how biological molecules move inside cells and tissues, or determine the
structure of those molecules precisely using electron microscopes.
And by assembling superatoms of elements such as gold,
carbon or aluminum, researchers may soon be able to create entirely new
materials. Such materials could store hydrogen fuel in solid form at room
temperature, make more powerful rocket fuels or lead to computer chips with
molecule-sized features.
“Designer” materials made of superatoms could have
combinations of physical properties that don’t exist in nature. As Kit Bowen, a
chemical physicist at
Small numbers of atoms often form structures as symmetrical,
and almost as intricate, as those of snowflakes. But while no two snowflakes,
even if they have the same number of water molecules, are identical, a small,
specific number of atoms of the same element typically will assemble into the
same, specific shape. The quintessential example is how 60 carbon atoms form
buckyballs. Metal atoms such as gold, aluminum or tin also like symmetry. For
example, 20 atoms of gold will assemble into a solid pyramid, but 16 will form
cage-like structures, as Lai-Sheng Wang, a physical chemist at
The strange behavior of atoms in small groupings has been
known for a long time, though only recently have scientists begun to understand
it in detail.
“The whole idea is that small is different,” says Bowen,
quoting what he says is a motto of Uzi Landman of the Georgia Institute of
Technology in
A material such as silicon, which is usually brittle, can
become as ductile as gold, researchers from the National Institute of Standards
and Technology reported last November in Applied
Physics Letters. Another example is particles called quantum dots, which
fluoresce in a rainbow of different colors depending on their size (SN 2/15/03, p. 107).
But with even fewer atoms — a few hundred or less — the
changes become more dramatic. “If you keep going smaller, then you enter a
region where properties are erratic,” Bowen says. “Often, one atom counts.” For
example, Wang and his collaborators have shown that tin clusters behave like
conductors or semiconductors, depending on their size; Bowen found something
similar with magnesium.
A job for superatom
For larger clusters, it’s not always clear when atoms will
aggregate into regular structures or into shapeless blobs with any number of
atoms. “What’s to stop the cluster from adding a few more atoms?” asks Roger
Kornberg, a structural biologist at
Last fall in Science,
Kornberg and colleagues described an intricate cluster they created with
exactly 102 gold atoms. He and his team synthesized their gold superatoms in a
liquid. To control the clusters’ growth, the team added sulfur-based organic
molecules called thiols, which bind easily to gold. Forty-four thiols bound to
each gold cluster’s surface, preventing the 102-atom clusters from coalescing
to form larger clusters.
What resulted was a superatom (or maybe a “supermolecule”)
with a core of 79 gold atoms arranged into a truncated decahedron: two pyramids
with pentagonal bases joined together into a diamond shape, but with the
pyramids’ tips chopped off. Around the core, more gold atoms formed an unusual
pattern, joining the thiols in shapes looking like handles. “The thing that
surprises me the most,” says Kornberg’s collaborator Pablo Jadzinsky, “is that
the geometry of the cluster cannot be described in simple words.”
The team determined the cluster’s structure using X-rays,
which required first coaxing the clusters into forming a crystalline solid.
Jadzinsky says that the very fact that the clusters could form a crystalline
solid means that they are all identical and that their shapes are fixed. At 1.5
nanometers, the clusters’ shapes may have fluctuated, as other nanometer-scale
shapes often do (SN: 3/15/03, p. 174).
But the numerology seems sort of random: Why 102 gold atoms?
Why 44 thiols? As it happens, superatom theory has a good explanation.
Each of the gold atoms donates an electron to the cluster,
just as inside larger chunks of metal, where mobile electrons can conduct
electricity. Forty-four of those electrons get immobilized in bonds between
gold atoms and thiols, leaving 58 electrons free to roam. These 58 electrons
then orbit the cluster’s core — made of positive gold ions — just
as they would orbit the nucleus of a stand-alone atom. And 58 happens to be a
“magic number.” It’s the number of electrons needed to fill a shell around the
superatom, so that it won’t feel a desire to add or shed electrons, which would
destabilize its structure
This process is similar to what happens in noble gases,
which are chemically inert because they have just the right number of electrons
to fill a shell around the atom.
Chemist Royce Murray of the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill and his collaborators describe the structure of a similar, though
smaller, gold-thiol cluster in the March 26 Journal
of the American Chemical Society.
Kornberg says that by tweaking the conditions in their lab’s
vials, he and his colleagues can obtain clusters of different numbers of gold
atoms and thiol molecules, although they haven’t determined the precise
structure in those cases yet.
Superbucky
Thiol-gold clusters could have medical uses because they
easily hook onto organic molecules. For example, clusters could help deliver
drugs through cellular membranes, or, once inside cells and tissues, act as dyes
for biomedical imaging.
Kornberg has another application in mind. His specialty is
figuring out the exact structure of proteins and other complex biomolecules.
“We have devoted decades to solving one structure,” Kornberg says, referring to
his work on the crucial enzyme RNA polymerase, for which he earned the 2006
Nobel Prize in chemistry. Superatoms could speed up the process dramatically.
The idea is to attach superatoms at specific sites on biomolecules in solution,
then flash freeze the superatoms and put them under the electron microscope.
Because their shapes are precisely known, the superatoms would act as
signposts, forming reference frames around each biomolecule. Computer
processing of the electron-microscope data could then pinpoint the exact position
of each atom in the biomolecule, producing an image of its structure, Kornberg
says.
“This would open up a whole new vista for structural
biology,” potentially revealing the structure of molecules that can’t be imaged
by standard methods.
In other recent work, Hrvoje Petek of the
“Above some energy, the structure of the molecule
disappears,” Petek says, and looks virtually like a smooth, hollow sphere. He
and his colleagues report in the April 18 Science
that a buckyball pair with added electrons might even form molecular bonds,
similar to those in hydrogen molecules.
Petek says rows of buckyballs aligned on a surface might
form circuits and be the basis of molecular-scale electronic chips. At less
than a nanometer thick, the circuits in buckychips would be tens of times
thinner than those in state-of-the-art silicon chips, allowing engineers to
pack more power into a chip.
Petek’s buckyballs are not the first superatoms to be
discovered that can behave like single atoms. Sometimes, clusters with a
particular number of atoms can even mimic the chemistry of a single atom of a
different element. The first hints of this surfaced more than two decades ago.
Spreading jellium
The story of the superatom begins when two physicists walk
into a barber shop. Marvin Cohen of the
While waiting for his haircut, Knight talked about some
surprising data from an experiment in which he had baked a block of sodium and
then measured the masses, and thus the sizes, of vaporized particles that came
out.
Knight’s particles came in a range of sizes. But those made
of eight, 20, 40, 58 (remember 58?) or 92 atoms were a lot more abundant. Cohen
guessed what might be happening, and he started scribbling some
back-of-the-envelope calculations. “Tony, the barber, thought we were figuring
out a way to beat the stock market,” Cohen recalls.
Sodium is a metal, with a propensity to shed one of its 11
electrons. In a cluster, atoms share these electrons in a “socialistic” way,
Cohen says. For simplicity, in his calculation he imagined the positive
electric charge of a cluster’s sodium ions (each of them an atom minus one
electron) as being spread uniformly like jelly, rather than concentrated at the
ions. Nuclear physicists use a similar model for atomic nuclei; they call it
the “jellium” model.
Jellium gave the right answer. The shared electrons orbiting
the cluster do so in different energy levels, or shells, just as they would in
an atom, Cohen figured. Computer calculations confirmed his guess. Like
ordinary atoms, clusters with unfilled electron shells are chemically reactive.
Full shells, with “magic numbers” of electrons, are not. Sodium clusters with
eight, 20 or 40 atoms are the analog of helium, neon, and the other noble
gases, which rarely form molecules. Clusters with non-magic numbers of atoms
tend to lose or gain electrons, making them more likely to also lose or gain
atoms (to get a magic number) through collisions with other clusters.
A year later, Exxon Corporate Research Lab chemist Robert
Whetten, now at Georgia Tech, and his collaborators noticed that clusters of
six aluminum atoms could split hydrogen molecules at room temperature,
something smaller clusters couldn’t do. “Only aluminum-6 jumped up and shouted
‘Here I am, I can do this!’” says Whetten. And in the late 1980s, Welford
Castleman of
The researchers realized that Cohen and Knight’s magic
numbers could explain the perplexing phenomenon. In an aluminum cluster, each
atom donates three electrons to the cause. The 13-atom cluster, or Al13,
for example, ended up with 39 common electrons (3 x 13), and the extra electron
in the ion Al13- was just what the cluster needed to
reach the magic number 40.
Researchers say that chemically stable forms of aluminum,
which can be destabilized and burned when needed, could someday yield a
powerful yet safe-to-handle additive for rocket fuel.
But the team went further. It showed that the neutral
clusters Al13, Al23 and Al37 get into similar
chemical reactions as do elements that crave one extra electron. Those are the
elements such as chlorine or fluorine, which in the periodic table are the
halogens, the column directly to the left of the noble gases.
Then in 1995, Shiv Khanna and Purusottam Jena of
Hot-fudge sundae
Two years ago, a team led by Bowen indeed produced K+Al13-
(potassium-aluminum) molecules and showed that their chemical properties
resemble those of molecules like K+Cl- or Na+Cl-.
In the last few years, researchers have also begun looking for ways to use super-
atoms to store hydrogen in solid form. The difficulty of transporting and
storing hydrogen at room temperature poses a formidable obstacle to the
much-touted hydrogen economy.
Several teams are now trying to create superatom-based salt
crystals — something that’s proving trickier than expected,
since once the molecules start aggregating, the superatoms tend to merge with
each other, forming clumps more than crystals. “When you put them together,
they slag themselves,” Bowen says. One approach is to coat superatoms with
other kinds of stuff, as Kornberg did. On the other hand, Castleman hopes that
replacing potassium ions with larger molecules might prevent superatoms from
coalescing. “You have a chance of keeping them away from each other,” he says.
The interest in making crystals out of superatoms goes
beyond pure curiosity. By adjusting the types, shapes and sizes of a material’s
ingredients, scientists and engineers could tune physical properties to their
likes. “You would have a way of making materials with tailored properties,”
Bowen says.
For example, a material that can be transparent typically
won’t conduct electricity, and vice versa. But a suitable all-metal salt, say,
might be able to do both. And with a stretch of imagination, all-aluminum salts
could make airplanes with see-through fuselages possible. Almost as cool as a
hot-fudge sundae.
Found in: Biology, Chemistry and Physics
- Feeling cagey
- NanoLights! Camera! Action!
- Bunches of atoms madly morph
- Purusottam Jena
link - Atsushi Nakajima
link
link
- Leuchtner, R.E., A.C. Harms, and A.W. Castleman Jr. 1989. Thermal metal cluster anion reactions: Behavior of aluminum clusters with oxygen. Journal of Chemical Physics 91(Aug. 15):2753. Abstract available at link.
- Zheng, W.-J. . . . and K.H. Bowen Jr. 2006. The ionic KAl13 molecule: A stepping stone to cluster-assembled materials. Journal of Chemical Physics 124(April 11):144304. Abstract avsilable at link.
- Heaven, M.W. . . . and R.W. Murray. 2008. Crystal structure of the gold nanoparticle [N(C8H17)4][Au25(SCH2CH2Ph)18]. Journal of the American Chemical Society 130(March 26):3754. Abstract available at link.
- Jadzinsky, P.D. . . . and R.D. Kornberg. 2007. Structure of a thiol monolayer–protected gold nanoparticle at 1.1 Å resolution. Science 318(Oct. 19):430.
- Khanna, S.N., and P. Jena 1995. Atomic clusters: Building blocks for a class of solids. Physical Review B 51(May 15):13705. Abstract available at link.
- Roach, P.J., A.C. Reber . . . S.N. Khanna, and A.W. Castleman Jr. 2007. Al4H7- is a resilient building block for aluminum hydrogen cluster materials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(Sept. 11):14565. Available at link.
- Pradeep, N., et al. 2007. Ductility at the nanoscale: Deformation and fracture of adhesive contacts using atomic force microscopy. Applied Physics Letters 91(Nov. 12):203114. DOI:10.1063/1.2815648. Abstract available at link.
- Henz, B., et al 2008. Computer simulation of nanoparticle aggregate fracture (Abstract: Q40.00003). American Physical Society meeting. March 10–14. New Orleans. Abstract available at link.
- Kornberg, R.D. 2007. The molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(Aug. 7):12955-12961. Abstract available at link.
- Feng, M., J. Zhao and H. Petek 2008. Atomlike, Hollow-CoreBound Molecular Orbitals of C60. Science 320 (Apr. 18): 359.DOI: 10.1126/science.1155866 available at link
